【禁聞】駱家輝清廉做派 中共罵新殖民主義

FacebookPrintFont Size簡體

【新唐人2011年8月31日訊】美國大使駱家輝赴北京上任亮相時的「背包客」清廉形象,在中國老百姓當中贏得喝采。而中共喉舌媒體《光明日報》網站日前發表一篇評論文章,把駱家輝的清廉作風稱為「美國新殖民主義」,擔心美國官員搶走中國人的民心。評論指出,御用文人在信息開放時代販賣仇美思想,引來的只能是眾人的嘲笑。目前《光明日報》已經將文章刪除。

這篇評論文章題目是「警惕駱家輝帶來的新殖民主義」,把矛頭直指新上任的美國大使。文章承認,駱家輝赴任沒有隨從、沒有警衛、沒有鮮花和掌聲、全家拎著大包小包抵達北京的平民作風,與眾多官僚權貴們的高高在上形成鮮明的對比和諷刺,贏得中國普通民眾的好感。

但是文章又說,「駱家輝給中國的官員們上課絕不是駱家輝的目地,為美國收攬贏得中國的民心,強化中國民眾崇洋媚外的奴性,進而召集民意以壯大美國在中國的支持力量,藉以分化中國斷裂甚至碎裂的意識形態,才是這位華裔大使的如意算盤。」

文章聲稱:「駱家輝華裔的身份使他能夠對中國的普通民眾産生親和力,暴露了美國以華治華、煽動中國政治動亂的卑鄙用心。」

原《紐約時報》新聞助理趙岩指出,中共的御用文人,不自覺的總是把美國和現代文明社會當做自己的敵人。不斷的給自己製造恐慌。

趙岩:「人家一切東西都是壞的,你的那些豪華奢侈的樓堂館所,那才是好的嗎?那不就是寧要社會主義的草,不要資本主義的苗,毛澤東思想,文革思想的再翻版嗎?」

趙岩指出,中共從毛澤東時代開始,就一直把美國視為最大的假想敵,儘管美國在二戰期間慷慨解囊的支持中國人民的抗戰,儘管美國把「庚子賠款」全部留在中國建立了「清華大學」。

趙岩:「從1950年抗美援朝開始,他就把美國當成最大的敵人。因為他清楚,當一個民主制度在一個國家國土上落實的時候,他這種專制,他這種殘酷的暴政,必然是實行不下去的。那麼為了欺騙人民怎麼辦?他就要想出一個假想敵。」

大陸文化評論家葉匡政指出,中共對美國的抗拒,就是獨裁對民主的恐懼。

葉匡政:「因為其實美國很多作為對很多極權社會確實是一種根本性的顛覆。無論是從思想,從行為,還是從價值上,都是一種顛覆。所以極權社會極權國家的理論家,對這種行為或這種意識,表現出反抗和抗拒或非常恐懼的心態。」

而御用文人為了給中共的獨裁統治尋找藉口,不惜指鹿為馬,黑白顛倒。

北京憲政學者陳永苗指出,中共仇美實質上是對西方民主憲政的抗拒。

陳永苗:「他說來說去還是想阻擋憲政的潮流,這個民主化的潮流。因為現在最大的問題要求憲政的話,那最大的啟迪當然還是來自西方。所以他說來說去還是想攔住對憲政化的潮流。所以他就在煽動極端民族主義的情緒,來服務於他的統治。」

駱家輝和拜登的清廉作風與中共官員的奢華作風形成鮮明對比,好像把中共專制的醜陋放在陽光之下暴曬。《光明日報》網站的這篇署名文章也發出哀歎:「如果中國共産黨不能主動自覺清除官僚主義的病毒以確保自己機體的健康,如果中國共産黨不能自己將黨和官分開以整頓吏治收復民心,那就等著駱家輝擄走我們的民心和民意再反過來給我們自己動手術吧!」

趙岩:「如果他們不能從拜登和駱家輝的身上看到真正的政府官員應該是怎樣的以身作則,來建立廉潔政府的形象的話,那麼早晚中共或者說中國(共)政府會因為腐敗而走向沒落和滅亡,這個不因他的經濟發展而決定。我們已經看到了,卡扎菲和穆巴拉克都因為自己的腐敗而喪失了自己的政權。」

《法國國際廣播電臺》的評論文章說,如果從投資與回報的比率來評估的話,拜登的「炸醬麵午餐」的宣傳效果,要比《新華社》耗資千萬在美國紐約「時代廣場」打廣告,不知要好上多少倍。一位副總統的一頓便飯,和一個新大使的輕裝到任,就淋漓盡致的展現了他的國家形象,且魅力無窮。

新唐人記者秦雪、蕭宇採訪報導。
====

Locke Tagged “Neo-colonialist"

U.S. Ambassador to Beijing Gary Locke』s “backpacker"
debut shows his rectitude, wining Chinese people』s acclaim.
However, Guangming Daily, Chinese Communist Party』s
(CCP) mouthpiece media, denounces on its website
Locke’s style as “American neo-colonialism.” It expresses
worry that U.S. officials will win over Chinese people』s heart.
Comments say that Guangming Daily tries to instigate
anti-American sentiment in the age of open information.
That will only bring ridicule. Later, Guangming Daily
removed the article from its website.

Entitled “Beware Of Locke』s Neo–colonialism," the article
directs its attack to the new American ambassador.
It admits, Locke brought no followers to his post, no guards,
no flowers or applause, but only his family with large bags.
This conduct is in sharp contrast to the Chinese bureaucrats,
winning the acclaim of many ordinary Chinese people.
At the same time the article says, “Locke is not trying
to educate Chinese officials, but to win over Chinese people,
to strengthen Chinese people』s fawning servility,
and to break up China』s ideology."
The article claims, “Locke』s performance of incorruptibility is
a despicable intention of instigating political unrest in China."
Former New York Times news assistant Zhao Yan said,

CCP』s hack writers always make an enemy of America
and the modern civilized society.
They keep seeking to instill panic in Chinese readers.

Zhao Yan: “If anything that belongs to others is bad, how
about your (CCP』s) luxury office buildings and mansions?
Isn』t that a replication of Maoism
from the Cultural Revolution?"
Zhao pointed out that communist China has regarded
America as the greatest enemy from the Mao era.
But in fact America provided generous support to China
during World War II.
And back in history, it returned all the Boxer Indemnity
to China to fund the establishment of Tsinghua University.
Zhao Yan: “Ever since the Korean War in 1950s,
CCP has depicted the United States as the biggest enemy,
because it knows that if a democratic system is established
in China, its tyranny will come to an end.
That is how they deceive Chinese people
with America as an enemy."

China』s cultural critic Ye Kuangzheng pointed out that CCP』s
anti-U.S. sentiment originates from its fear of democracy.
Ye: “America indeed has undermining power against many
totalitarian regimes in terms of thinking, behavior and values.
So totalitarian states show great resistance and fear
toward America』s value system and social institutions."
CCP』s hack writers, however, spare no effort
in distorting facts to legitimatize CCP』s rule.
Beijing constitutional scholar Chen Yongmiao pointed out
that CCP』s anti-American sentiment
is actually a resistance toward
the Western constitutional democracy.

Chen Yongmiao: “Whatever it (CCP) says, it just wants
to block the trend of constitutional government,
the trend of democratization. The West provides
the best examples of constitutional democracy,
so CCP just tries to counteract the West』s influence.
It incites extreme nationalist sentiments to serve its rule."
Locke and Biden’s style of incorruptibility is in sharp contrast
to the luxurious style of Chinese officials.
It is an exposure of the ugly communists』 dictatorship face.

Even the Guangming Daily article lamented:
“If CCP cannot take the initiative to consciously remove
the virus in its bureaucracy,
if CCP cannot separate itself from the government,
it can only watch Locke winning Chinese people』s hearts!"
Zhao Yan: “If they (CCP) cannot learn incorruptibility from
Biden and Locke on how an official should perform his duty,
CCP will sooner or later decline because of corruption.
This cannot be saved by economic development.
We have seen that both Gaddafi and Mubarak have lost
their political power because of corruption."

Radio France Internationale』 review article said that Biden’s
“noodle lunch" produced way better advertisement effect
than Xinhua News Agency』s “Times Square show" billboard
for CCP』s image, which costs over US$10 million.
A simple meal of a vice president
and a simple inauguration of a new ambassador
can vividly demonstrate a country』s true values
and win people』s hearts.

NTD reporters Qin Xue and Xiao Yu.

相關文章
評論