【禁聞】艾未未反擊 民眾譴責環球時報

FacebookPrintFont Size簡體

【新唐人2011年11月24日訊】中國著名藝術家艾未未,在遭到大陸官方媒體不斷抹黑後,這幾天他做出反擊,在推特貼出《環球時報》總編輯等4人的手機號碼,並稱呼他們是「五毛領軍人物」。民眾對艾未未非常支持,認為公布這些人的手機號碼,可以讓更多人去譴責他們。

11月20號,艾未未在推特上貼出《環球時報》總編胡錫進、報紙主筆王文、中國政法大學副教授吳法天和左派人士司馬南的手機號碼。

艾未未指責《環球時報》與公安聯手對他進行打壓,在他被中共拘留期間,《環球時報》不遺餘力對他進行抹黑,並且抹黑的節奏和公安審訊一致,他的名字在所有的報紙都不能出現,在新浪微博上也被封殺。唯有《環球時報》有特殊權力來對他進行專職的抹黑。

艾未未母親高瑛:「我認為公布他們的電話是對的,艾未未一個人他又沒輿論工具,他的網站給封了,他的博客都封了。你是一個媒體,你整天在媒體裡胡說八道,你還不願公布你的電話號碼,你也太見不得太陽了見不得陽光了。你打人家一百下,人家踢你一腳就不可以了,艾未未現在幹甚麼都不對,他們可以隨便說,艾未未說就有事。」

結石寶寶家長趙連海也支持艾未未的做法。

趙連海:「司馬南他這幾個人,實際上他們這些人目前來講,做的事情就是來為專制體制在做喉舌,所以公布他們的一些信息,讓更多的人去遣責他,我認為是必要的。」

記者23號致電《環球時報》總編胡錫進等4人,司馬南關機,另外3人的電話則始終無人接聽。但胡錫進在微博上說他接到大量短信,不斷有人打電話打擾。吳法天在微博上說他在幾分鐘內攔截幾百條短信,300多個電話。

對此,前山東大學教授孫文廣表示,沒做虧心事不怕鬼敲門。

孫文廣:「那麼就是(我)寫的每一篇文章都把自己的電話放在上面,為的就是便於別人聯繫。對於這些人來講啊,他們如果說真沒做甚麼虧心事的話,讓別人知道他的電話號碼呢,也沒甚麼大的問題。」

《環球時報》早前曾發表評論,號稱西方給艾未未的庇護太特殊、艾未未借錢還稅改變不了逃稅事實等……。

22號,《環球時報》又針對艾未未公布總編電話號碼一事,以中英文連續發表3篇文章抨擊艾未未。其中一篇號稱,艾未未的行為是「因政治分歧而採取反道德行為的又一突出例子」。並宣稱:從未對艾未未進行過人身攻擊。

孫文廣:「現在中國算是敢于批評政府的人,敢于批評當局的人,那麼官方媒體都會一致下手進行打壓。」

《環球時報》的另一篇文章,則一如既往的給艾未未帶上「反華」的大帽子。

趙連海:「艾未未這個事件簡單來說,實際上就是官方在進行壓制,對民間維權,對民間爭取公眾自由,爭取民主一種打壓。」

公共知識份子丁咚發文,斥責《環球時報》自誕生之日起就以意識形態劃界,主動放棄一個媒體的社會責任,放棄良知,自覺充當利益集團的打手。

艾未未則對《美國之音》表示,這些人用《人民日報》旗下的報紙發洩私憤,卻不敢站出來與他正面交鋒。他說:有本事我們來做一個辯論? 或者也讓我在《環球時報》上發表一篇文章?

趙連海呼籲胡錫進、司馬南這類中共喉舌,應該思考一下中國的大形勢,不要再做違背良心的歷史罪人。

新唐人記者李韻、孫寧採訪報導。

Ai Published GT Editors』 Phones

The renown Chinese artist Ai Weiwei is being consistently
discredited by the official media in mainland China.
Now he is fighting back by twittering the phone numbers
of four chief editors』 of Global Times and calling them “leaders of the 50 cent army." People are supportive of Ai and think the phone numbers』
announcement will help more people condemn the editors.

On November 20, Ai Weiwei posted the phone numbers
of Global Times』 key staff on Twitter.
These include the chief editor Hu Xijin, the chief writer
Wang Wen, A/Prof. of Politics and Law University Wu Fatian, and the leftist Si Manan.

Ai accused Global Times and the police of pressuring him
during his detention by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Global Times spared no efforts to discredit him,
which was in conjunction with the police』s interrogation.
His name can not appear in any newspaper
or Sina micro-blog.
Only Global Times has the special power
to carry out a full-time discrediting materials on him.

Wang Ying (Ai Weiwei』s mother): “I think it is not wrong
to publish their phone numbers.
Ai Weiwei does not have any media tools,
and his website and blog are sealed.
This is a media that publishes nonsense all day long,
but does not want to show its phone numbers.
It is too timid and fearful. It is like you can punch others
a hundred times, but do not allow others to hit you even ones.
Whatever Ai Weiwei does is not wrong now. They can say
whatever they want, but if Ai speaks, there will be a problem."

Zhao Lianhai, the father of Jieshi Baobao,
also supports Ai Weiwei』s deed.

Zhao Lianhai: “These people, like Si Manan, in the current
situation are mouthpieces of the authoritarian regime.
So it is necessary to publish some of their information,
as to let more people condemn them."

On November 23 , a reporter called Global Times』
editor Hu Xijin and the other three people.
Only Si Manan』s phone was on,
no one answered the other three』s phones.
But Hu Xijin said he received a lot of text messages
on his microblog and someone kept calling him.
Wu Fatian said on his microblog that he received hundreds
of text messages and more than 300 calls in a few minutes.

In this regard, the former professor of Shandong University,
Sun Wenguang said, if they didn』t do anything wrong, they won』t be afraid of ghosts knocking on their door.

Sun Wenguang: “I added my phone number on every
article I wrote to help others contact me.
For these people, if they didn』t do anything against good
conscience, there is no big problem to let people know their phone numbers."

Earlier Global Times wrote, Ai Weiwei got special protection
from the West and could not change the fact to borrow money and pay back his tax evasion…

On November 22, Global Times published three articles,
both in English and Chinese, criticizing Ai』s phone numbers』 publishing.
One of the articles wrote, Ai Weiwei’s behavior is “another
example of anti-ethical behavior due to political differences."
And it declared that they have never
personally attacked Ai Weiwei.

Sun Wenguang: “Now in mainland China, people who have
the courage to criticize the Chinese government and
dare to criticize the authorities,
will be suppressed by all official media."

Another Global Times』 article slapped Ai Weiwei
with the usual “anti-China" label.

Zhao Lianhai: “To simply explain Ai Weiwei』s case, this is
the official suppression of civil rights, of the fight for freedom and democracy."

Intellectual Ding Dong wrote an article,
which denounced the actions of the Global Times.
He wrote, from their date of birth they obeyed the ideological
demarcation,
gave up their social responsibility and conscience as a media,
and acted as thugs of the interests』 groups.

Ai Weiwei told Voice of America that these newspapers under
the umbrella of People’s Daily vent their private anger, but don』t dare to confront him face to face.
He said: “If you dare we can have a debate?
Or let me publish an article in Global Times?"

Zhao Lianhai called for Hu Xijin, Si Manan and the other
CCP mouthpieces to think about the big picture in China.
He asked them to stop acting against their conscience
and not be of those people that history will condemn.

NTD reporters Li Yun and Sun Ning.

相關文章
評論