【新唐人2013年04月29日訊】在中國大陸各類冤假錯案、惡性勞教等醜聞不斷，中共政法系統弊端日益凸顯的情況下，北京當局也頻頻發聲倡議司法公正。日前，最高人民法院舉辦座談會，召集專家學者探討如何「提升司法公信力」，並宣稱「司法公正」已經成為最高法院以後的工作主題。那麼，在中共獨裁體制存在中國的現況下，中國有可能司法獨立嗎﹖還是像專家學者所指稱的那樣——中國「依法治國」只能是幻夢一場﹗
今年中共兩會當選最高人民法院院長的周強，4月26號召集專家學者，舉辦了一場所謂「提升司法公信力」的座談會，徵求專家學者和律師界代表們的意見和建議。座談會分為上、下午兩場，被邀請的專家有17名，律師則有3人。
周強在會上聲稱，要讓群眾在每一個司法案件中都感受到公平正義，推進公正司法，不斷提升司法公信力，落實依法治國的要求。這已經是他在這個月之內就「司法公正」的第二次表態。
北京律師董正偉：「最近一個時期法院出現了這麼多錯案、冤案。這個時候法院的心理就是，過去西方國家有一個思想家的一句話，一個不公正的裁判，它污染的是一個河流。這樣的話，它對中國的這些法院司法的公正性和公信力，都產生了一個極大的懷疑和不信任。」
周強在座談會上表示，十八大以來，中共新領導層對依法治國很重視，這是提高司法公信力，促進依法治國的新契機。
中國「東南大學」法學教授張讚寧：「（中共）在建政以後，一直都在提司法公正，但是這個司法卻反而變得越來越不公正。毛澤東提過、鄧小平提過、江澤民也提過，也都講過要司法公正。但是在江澤民時期，司法是越來越不公正，甚至是司法行政化、司法黑社會化，根本就不依法辦事。」
中共新任總書記習近平上臺後，曾在不同場合喊出「依法治國」的口號。他在最近主持召開的中央政治局會議中，還提出「照鏡子、正衣冠、洗洗澡、治治病」的十二字方針，並說這是在新形勢下作出的一個「黨要管黨、從嚴治黨」的重大決策。
《德國之聲》評論文章認為，「黨要管黨」實際上是「一黨專政」的核心，就是共產黨要自己管自己，不容許人民染指權力。而今天的司法不公、權錢交易、腐化墮落、貧富懸殊的病態中國，都是在歷次「黨要管黨」的運動中逐漸加碼升級而形成的。
中國「東南大學」法學教授張讚寧：「只有司法獨立了，才有可能做到司法公正。在司法不獨立的情況下，比如大陸的司法要受制於某一個政黨，受制於某一個部門、或者受制於某一個領導人，或者司法要由行政部門來干預的話，那麼這個公正是永遠不可能做到的。」
文章還指出，中共執政64年期間，從來沒有認真執行過《憲法》。《憲法》對中國人民權利的保障，始終像一張白紙，沒有任何約束力。
香港《開放》雜誌針對中共新領導層高喊的「依法治國」口號，也在4月初發表了評論文章。
這篇題為《十八大後的中國法治幻夢》文章，分析了近期發生的幾樁涉及中國法治狀況的事件。文章指出，重慶的「平反黑打」離不開政治擺佈，山東維權人士陳光誠侄子「陳克貴案」，離不開枉法裁判，「爆料反腐」離不開紀委插手，湖南邵陽維權人士「朱承志案」則離不開暴力瘋狂。而這些都不是中共十八大後有意推動司法改革或邁向法治的先聲，而是中國法治狀況持續沉淪的鐵證。
文章得出結論，中共專政體制瓦解之日，才是司法真正獨立之時。
採訪/易如 編輯/李明飛 後製/陳建銘
The Supreme People’s Court Collected Advice from Scholars:
Is Juridical Justice a Dream?
In China, there have been so many cases that were wrong,
false and unjustly repudiated.
The disadvantages of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP)
politics and law system have become more and more prominent.
In this situation, the CCP in Beijing has made
frequent calls for juridical justice.
Recently the Supreme People’s Court held a symposium with
specialists and scholars to discuss enhancing juridical credibility.
“Juridical justice” was the headline topic of the
Supreme People’s Court for the future.
Nevertheless, is juridical justice possible in
the CCP’s one-party dictatorship regime?
Is it possible that the Judiciary can be independent?
Or is the CCP’s slogan “ruling in accordance with the law”
nothing but a dream?
Zhou Qiang was elected as President of the
Supreme People’s Court in the National Congress this year.
On April 26th he held the symposium “Enhance the Credibility
of the Judiciary” with scholars and specialists.
Zhou Qiang collected advice from the attendees
of the symposium.
There were two sessions; morning and afternoon.
17 specialists were invited, but only three lawyers.
Zhou Qian claimed in the symposium that
very person and every case will be addressed with justice.
Judicial justice will be promoted so that
the credibility of the judiciary can be improved.
This way ruling the country by law can be realized.
This is the second time that Zhou made comments on “judicial justice".
Dong Zhengwei, a lawyer working in Beijing, “Recently, there
have been many cases of wrong, false and unjust judgments.
A western ideologist once said one unfair judgment
is like a polluted river, which would make the sea toxic.
Therefore, every unjust case will cause a great deal of
suspicion and mistrust to the CCP’s credibility of judiciary.”
In the symposium, Zhou Qiang claimed the new
CCP leadership emphasizes ruling the country with law.
It’s a good timing to enhance the creditability of judiciary.
Zhang Zanning, a law professor from Southeastern
University in China: “Since the CCP founded the regime, it has been claiming judicial justice.
Nevertheless, it has become more and more unjust.
Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin
all claimed to realize judicial justice.
However, especially in Jiang Zeming’s office term,
the judicial justice has been deteriorating rapidly.
Judicature became administrative-related
and controlled by gangs.
It was impossible to address the justice according to law.”
Since Xi Jingping took the presidency, he called for
“ruling the country according to law” on various occasions.
In the recent political bureau meeting,
Xi proposed a guideline phrase;
“Look into the mirror, sort out your clothes,
take a bath, see a doctor.”
In the new political situation, he proposed,
“the party should manage the party itself;
the party should be supervised more strictly”.
The commentary article from “the Voice of Germany” stated
the claim “the party should manage the party”
still means “one-party dictatorship”.
It means that the CCP will manage itself and
ordinary people cannot get any power.
Nonetheless, today’s juridical injustice, money and
power trade, rampant corruption and polarization of the rich and poor,
are all caused by and escalated in the political
activities of “the party managing the party”.
Zhang Zanning: “only when judicature is independent,
can judicial justice be realized.
If judicature is still controlled by some department, official,
or the CCP intervenes, judicial justice will never happen.”
The article also stated that the CCP has never
seriously implemented the Constitution.
The Constitution is nothing but piece of paper,
which cannot guarantee people’s rights.
Hong Kong’s “Open Magazine” also published
an article on the CCP’s slogan “running the country in accordance with the law”.
The article was entitled “China’s Dream of Rule
of Law after the 18th National Congress”.
It described the CCP’s current judicial situation
by analyzing a couple of recent cases.
The article claimed that Chongqing’s
“redressing wrong cases” is political manipulation.
Cheng Guangcheng’s nephew was still sentenced
in an unjust manner.
“Reporting corruption” is also controlled by
the CCP’s Discipline Committee.
The case of Zhu Chengzhi, the human right activist,
is still full of violence.
All of those facts are not the herald of the CCP’s
“ruling the country in accordance with the law”.
But they are the firm evidence of the
CCP’s judicature deteriorating further.
The article draws the conclusion: the day the CCP dictatorship
disintegrates is the day of realizing juridical independence.
