【新唐人2014年09月09日訊】香港最大的學生組織「學聯」，星期天正式宣佈，從9月22號開始，罷課一週，以抗議中共人大有關香港的政改方案，並將根據罷課後北京和港府反應，未來會升級抗爭行動。面對「罷課」和「佔中」這些體現港人強烈民意的活動，中共有可能退讓嗎？「公民抗命」怎樣才能撼動「鐵腕政治」？請看報導。
港媒8號引述「香港大學」學生會會長梁麗幗的話說，已經有大約20家大專院校表明，會參加罷課活動。發起罷課的香港「學聯」要求港府在罷課期間，回應學生4點要求，包括確立公民提名，承諾2016年立法會全面直選﹔特首和政改三人組辭職，人大常委向港人道歉等。
「學聯」秘書長周永康：「簡單的說，整個概念就是，要由院校走出社區。所以第一天在中大會有一個大集會，在百萬大道那邊。另外，不同的學生會也認為，其實要先在院校裡面有一大集會，然後再走出院校，所以罷委會的決議是這樣子。」
「學聯」秘書長周永康介紹，之後幾天，「學聯」會根據形勢判斷，甚麼時候走出社區，到公眾地方，例如公民廣場，或是添馬公園，舉行大集會。到那時就不止是學生的行動，而是整個香港人的行動。
周永康：「那它的社會意義在於，罷課是這麼多間大專院校的年輕人發起來，新生代也不滿意現在人大的決議。所以他要用罷課的形式，告訴社會上不能再冷漠。那第二個重要的要點是，它清晰的給政府一個警告，如果那些訴求，譬如，公民提名立法會議改組，不會納入第二階段，而成為改革方向的話，那整個運動必然會升級，那時候必然會有更多的不合作運動，和公民抗命。」
另一方面，親政府的「保普選反佔中」大聯盟也在8號召開記者會，宣佈設立「報料熱線」，要市民對於在院校裡策劃「罷課」或「佔中」的人，提供資料。大聯盟聲稱，這樣的「反罷課」活動，是為了避免學生被人利用，成為政治犧牲品。
對此周永康則回應，社會裏面有不同的聲音是完全正常的，但希望不要抹黑，中傷罷課活動。
周永康：「其實重點是，他們反罷課的時候，不要抹黑學生是給人操控，是沒有獨立性，而是淪為政治的工具，或是政治籌碼。你可以說，你覺得學生的責任是學習，那我們就會回答你，其實你在廣場上面，會學的比院校裡面更多。而你單純在院校裡面學習，你不足以改革這個社會。如果本身大學希望的是，培養學生成為一個回饋社會的人的話。」
「罷課」即將啟動，「佔中」似乎也勢在必行。面對這些體現港人強烈民意的活動，當局有可能做出退讓嗎？
時事評論員文昭：「中共不可能退讓的。本身香港需要的是一個持續性的，和一個更加廣泛的不服從運動。單純寄希望於一次遊行示威，段時間內能取得一個回應，這也確實不太現實。因為五十萬港人上街，七十多萬人簽名，而中共仍然它是沒有做絲毫的退讓。」
「罷課」如同香港學生凝聚起來的一只年輕的手臂，面對人大就特首候選人落下的「三道大關」，這支年輕的臂膀如何才能撼動這些關卡？
文昭：「本身這個學生運動，應該是一個面向民眾的。就是說，現在香港所需要做的，是一個更加深入和廣泛的民族啟蒙。只有更多的民眾認識到民主權力對自己的重要，被動員起來，那麼這種『公民不服從』運動它才有實際的力量，它才能癱瘓政府去管制基層社會的許多能力，這政府幹不下去了，它才會覺得有壓力，去改變。」
儘管面臨的結果，很大可能還是當局「一意孤行」，但這支年輕的臂膀並不是孤立無援。中學生組織「學民思潮」也舉行了多場「公民課堂」，並籌備在兩個月內發動中學生罷課。而《法新社》報導，7號抵達北京，進行3天訪問的美國國家安全顧問萊斯（Susan Rice），也可能重申美國對香港民主的支持。另外，英國議會外交委員會，不僅將繼續針對香港的現狀進行調查，還把北京及港府的三封施壓信件在官方網站公布，引發關注。
採訪編輯/尚燕 後製/舒燦
Hong Kong Students Demand an Apology from Beijing
Hong Kong Federation of Students (HKFS) announced
a one-week strike will officially take place on Sept. 22.
It is in protest of the political reform in Hong Kong issued
by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC).
The next move after the protest, is contingent upon the response
from Beijing and HK Government.
Will the Communist regime back off as they face the strong
voices of strike and Occupy Central?
How will civil disobedience shake the iron-handed politics?
Let’s see the coverage.
According to University of Hong Kong’s Students’ Union
(HKUSU) president Yvonne Leung, participants will include
20 colleges and universities.
Strike organizer HKFS pursues four requests:
to establish civil nomination; to promise universal suffrage
of Legislative Council in 2016;
resignation of chief executive and political reform trio;
and NPCSC’s apology to the people of Hong Kong.
HKFS chairperson Alex Chow: “Simply put, the whole concept
is to get out of campus and to get into the community.
There’ll be a general assembly for the first day at the Chinese
University of Hong Kong.
This is the consensus from other institutions too, forming
a general assembly on campus before going into society.
That’s the decision of the strike committee."
Alex Zhou concludes, HKFS will determine, according to
the situation, when to get out into the community in places
such as the civic plaza or Tamar Park, for a large rally.
It will then become an activity of the entirety Hong Kong,
not just the students.
Alex Zhou: “The social significance of the student organized
strike, is that the new generation is not satisfied
with the resolution of the NPCSC.
The strike is telling society that it can no longer be ignored.
It is also a clear warning to the Government.
We demand civil nomination to reform the Council.
If it fails, the entire movement is bound to engage in more
non-cooperative movements and civil disobedience."
In a Sept. 8 press conference by Alliance for Peace and
Democracy (APD), the pro-government anti-Occupy
Central organization,
created a “report hotline" established to encourage
the public to report on organizers of the strike
and Occupy Central.
The APD claimed the anti-strike was meant to prevent students
from being victimized and taken advantage of.
Alex Zhou responded, different voices in the community are
completely normal, but the strike activities should not be
discredited or slandered.
Alex Zhou: “In fact, the point is not to discredit the students
by saying the strike was the outcome of manipulation,
lack of independence, and a political tool or bargaining chip.
It is ok to say, the students’ duty is to learn, we’ll tell you that
we actually learn more in the community than on campus.
By simply learning on campus, is not sufficient to reform
the society, if the higher education is to nourish the students
so that they will feed back to the community."
The strike is about to start, and the Occupy Central
also seems imperative.
Will the regime give in faced with these activities reflecting
the strong opinion of Hong Kong people?
Commentator Wen Zhao: “There is no way for the CCP to give
in. Hong Kong needs a disobedience campaign that is persistent
and more extensive.
It is not realistic to expect one demonstration will receive
any response in a short time.
The CCP did not yield a bit after 500,000 people took the street
and 700,000 signed the petition."
The strike is like an arm of the youth gathered by the
Hong Kong students.
How will this arm shake the hurdles set up by the NPCSC
regarding the chief executive candidates?
Wen Zhao: “The student movement itself should be facing people.
What Hong Kong needs is the entire enlightenment of the nation.
Only when people recognize the importance of their democratic
rights will they then get mobilized.
Then the civil disobedience campaign will gain its actual power
to paralyze the government, which will lose its control
at the grassroots of society. Then there’s pressure
for the government to change."
Although the regime could solely insist on its decision,
the students are not alone.
Scholarism formed by the secondary school students, have
organized multiple citizen classes and prepared a high schoolers’
strike in two months.
The Agence France-Presse reported the US National Security
Adviser Susan Rice arrives in Beijing on Sept. 7.
She is expected to restate Washington’s support for democracy
in Hong Kong.
In addition, the British Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee
continue to investigate the current situation in Hong Kong,
as well as publicize the three letters from Beijing
opposing the British investigation.
Interview & Edit/ShangYan Post-Production/ShuCan
