【禁聞】新古田會議後 中共猛批軍隊國家化

FacebookPrintFont Size簡體

【新唐人2014年11月06日訊】在1929年的「古田會議」上,中共確立了「黨指揮槍」的原則。然而85年過去了,在今年10月30號到11月2號的中共全軍「新古田會議」上,中共軍委主席習近平再次強調了「軍隊堅持黨的領導」。此後,中共官方各大媒體對此紛紛表態,強調黨指揮槍的重要性。很多媒體還批判了「軍隊國家化」的論調。

《解放軍報》、《新華網》等中共媒體,近來連續發表評論員文章紀念古田會議,併進一步強化黨指揮槍的理念,清除軍隊國家化的雜音。

《環球時報》評論說,「散佈『軍隊國家化』的可謂是一批『心很黑』的力量,在這一核心問題上跟著搖旗吶喊的,大概是中國最糊塗的一批人。」

紅二代少將羅援則宣稱,中共「軍隊國家化亡黨亡國。」

美國中文雜誌《中國事務》總編輯伍凡:「現在習近平上臺之後,他更要拉的軍隊緊緊的,不把軍隊拉住,共產黨就完蛋了,所以為甚麼羅援寫的文章說,軍隊國家化就亡黨亡國。是的,共產黨要亡。我們問一句,共產黨為甚麼不可以亡呢?」

美國中文雜誌《中國事務》總編輯伍凡表示,軍隊是老百姓納稅養的,為甚麼歸於一個黨、聽一個黨指揮呢?

大陸知名學者曹思源最近在網上撰文表示,研究完世界上110個國家的憲法,他發現84個國家規定軍隊歸屬政府。即使沒有在憲法中作出規定的國家,軍隊實際上也是歸屬政府。他認為,世界各國軍隊國家化是大勢所趨。

曹思源教授還揭示,從《毛澤東選集》中看出,毛在1945年曾明確地說:「軍隊是國家的」。

前中共總理周恩來還在1946年1月16號,曾代表中共公布了軍隊國家化的具體標準:軍隊不屬於個人;軍隊不屬於派系﹔軍隊不屬於地方;軍隊不屬於政黨﹔軍隊屬於國家。

維權律師李方平也在社交媒體上發了一張標為1944年《新華日報》的圖片。圖片上寫道:「軍隊國家化是新中國的基本國策,黨衛軍是法西斯和蔣介石才幹的事情,是欺騙人民的卑鄙手段」。

伍凡:「共產黨說話不算話。在70年前,共產黨反對國民黨蔣介石的時候,它要求軍隊國家化,它要把軍隊從國民黨的黨軍變成國家軍隊。

伍凡表示,中共自己建政後完全變了,死死把軍隊控制在它的手下,是名副其實的黨衛軍,但現在台灣的軍隊已經國家化了。

其實,近年來,針對中共軍隊是否應該國家化的討論聲音不斷增加。據說,18大前,中共總參謀部副總參謀長章沁生,就因公開主張軍隊國家化被軍委停了職。

近來,隨著徐才厚落馬引發的軍隊異動,中共也升高了批判「軍隊國家化」的調門。

中共軍委第一副主席許其亮撰文稱,要「善於從法理高度旗幟鮮明批駁『軍隊非黨化、非政治化』和『軍隊國家化』。」國防大學教授公方彬也回應說,「軍隊國家化」沒有法理基礎。

「中國社會民主黨」中央委員會主持人劉因全指出,大陸的憲法是中共起草,並讓「人大」這個橡皮圖章強行通過的。這個憲法不是人民表決產生的,產生的本身就不合法。

劉因全認為,軍隊成為黨衛軍,就是當年希特勒納粹給世界造成災難的根本原因。現在全世界都走向「軍隊國家化」,但中共以中國特殊為由而反對,就是想維持對中國人的奴役。

「中國社會民主黨」中央委員會主持人劉因全:「他們製造的這種中國特殊論,這是為了維持一黨專制編造的謬論。說甚麼別的國家可以實行軍隊國家化,中國不行。為甚麼中國不行?沒有道理嘛!」

劉因全指出,中共製造了多種「中國特色」謊言,像中國人素質低不能搞民主、不能有人權,目的是維護它們在中國為所慾為的專制統治。

採訪/易如 編輯/宋風

Communist Propaganda Attack of Nationalized Army

In 1929, at a military political work conference in Gutian,
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) established
the principle of “the Party commands the gun."

The CCP Military Commission Chairman Xi Jinping
reiterated the absolute leadership of the Party
over the military 85 years later during
the new Gutian Conference on Oct. 30.

Subsequently, Chinese media showed their support
by stressing the importance of Party control over the army.

Many Communist media also criticized
civilian control of the military.

Communist media such as People’s Liberation Army Daily
and Xinhua have issued commentaries commemorating
the Gutian Conference to strengthen the principle
of Party control of the army, and to eradicate the noise,
i.e., the one supports the civilian control of the military.

The CCP mouthpiece Global Times commented that,
‘those who advocate nationalization of the military
are dark forces; those who cheer on the issue
are most likely the losers.’

Major General Luo Yuan claimed, “nationalization of the
military will surely demise the Party and ruin the nation."

China Affairs magazine editor-in-chief, Chris Wu:
“For Xi Jinping, he has to hold the army tightly.

Without the army, the CCP is gone.

That’s why Luo Yuan stated that the nationalization
of the army will ruin the Party and the state.

Yes, the CCP should perish.
But, we ask, why can’t the Party perish?"

Chris Wu indicates that the army relies on taxes.
Why should the army take commands from a Party?

Renowned Chinese scholar Cao Siyuan argued in an online
article that of 110 constitutions in the world, 84 defined
the army under the control of the government.

The ones without specific ruling also put
the army under the control of government.

He believes nationalization of the army is the trend.

Professor Cao Siyuan also revealed that in the “Selected
Works of Mao Zedong", Mao clearly stated in 1945 that,
“The army belongs to the country."

In fact, no army in the world does not belong to the state.

Former Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai also announced
the army nationalization standard on Jan. 16, 1946:

“The army does not belong to the individual;
the army does not belong to factions;
the army does not belong to the place;
the army does not belong to political parties;
the army belongs to the state."

Human rights lawyer Li Fangping publicized a 1944
Xinhua Daily report online:

“Nationalization of the military is the new China’s basic
national policy.

Party military is a dirty trick to deceive the people
by the like of fascist and Chiang Kai-shek."

Chris Wu: “The CCP says one thing and does another.

To oppose Chiang Kai-shek and his Kuomintang
70 years ago, the CCP demanded nationalization
of the army so that the Kuomintang army would become
a national army."

Chris Wu indicates that after the regime was established,
the CCP tightly controled the army and the PLA
is the CCP army, while the army in Taiwan has transitioned
into a state army.

In fact, in recent years, voices in support of nationalization
of the PLA have been heard.

It was said that prior to the 18th National Congress,
Deputy Chief of the General Staff Zhang Qinsheng
was dismissed for his public advocate
of army nationalization.

Following the downfall of Xu Caihou, the criticism
of army nationalization has been increased.

First Deputy Chairman of the Central Military Commission
Xu Qiliang wrote, “Must clearly refute the ‘non-Party’,
‘non-political’ and ‘nationalized’ army."

“National Defense University professor Gong Fangbin also
responded, “Nationalization of the military has no legal basis."

China Social Democratic Party Central Committee moderator
Liu Yinquan points out that CCP drafted the constitution
and forced the People’s Congress to pass the law.

The constitution was illegal because
it was not voted on by the people.

Liu Yinquan believes that the Party army is the underlying
cause of the world disaster caused by the Nazi Hitler.

While the worlds armies are nationalized, the CCP fights
against it with the excuse of China being special
just for the purpose of slavering the Chinese.

Liu Yinquan: “The so-called ‘China being special’ is to
maintain the concocted fallacy of one-party dictatorship.

Why can’t China’s army be nationalized but others can?

It does not make sense!"

Liu Yinquan points out that the lies about China’s
Characteristics such as the low quality of Chinese does not
suit for democracy or deserve human rights are created
by the CCP to preserve its authoritarian rule in China.eng

Interview/YiRu Edit/ShongFeng

相關文章
評論