【新唐人2014年05月05日讯】新疆乌鲁木齐火车站爆炸案发生后，当地警方在24小时之内即宣告破案，并将案件定性为“暴力恐怖袭击”，声称两名袭击者已当场死亡。但随后，新疆警方又发布悬赏通告，征集袭击者相关线索，悬赏金额高达10万，但很快通告又被删除，引发了舆论广泛质疑。外界纷纷猜测警方为求立功“未破案，先捷报”，并且至少还有几名嫌疑犯仍然在逃。
5月3号下午，新疆乌鲁木齐警方在新浪网的官方微博发表《悬赏通告》说，4月30号乌鲁木齐火车站发生“暴力恐怖袭击案”，现对两名施暴嫌疑人情况进行查证，如果有发现罪嫌疑人施暴前乘坐车辆、租住房屋、入住宾馆等情况，立即联系警方。联系人韩警官、张警官、王警官。
《新唐人》记者：“请问是韩警官是吗？”
新疆公安局沙依巴克区分局韩警官：“啊，我是。”
记者：“我想问一下，你们在网上发这个“悬赏通告”是几个人呢？”
韩警官：“两个人，通告上指定的是两个人。”
警方还宣称，对提供重要线索的有功人员，奖励人民币十万元，对隐瞒不报者，将追究法律责任。此外，通告还附上了多张“犯罪嫌疑人”的照片作为参考。
而在此之前，爆炸案刚刚发生的24小时内，新疆警方以及大陆各官方媒体口径一致的对外宣称：
1、案件已经“连夜告破”。
2、这是一起“严重暴力恐怖袭击爆炸案”。
3、爆炸造成3人死亡，2名嫌犯当场被炸死。
4、两名袭击者都是新疆维族人，其中一名已查明身份。
网民不禁质疑，爆炸嫌犯不是当场死亡了吗，还要悬赏什么信息？难道之前“破案”有假？
旅美政论家伍凡：“这个里边，说白了，一句话，在欺骗观众、欺骗老百姓，在摆乌龙。人还没有抓到，或者没有确切人的准确的消息，就把两个嫌犯中间一个名字公布了，它为了什么，为了要破案。（之前）就制造一个假的、不真实的、不完全的资料公布。非常可能根本就不是他们两个。”
此外，据香港《南华早报》5月3号报导宣称，新疆警方在5月1号发出内部“协查通报”，要求有关当局，动用所有资源，包括“秘密部队”，尽一切办法彻查暴徒及其他嫌疑人。同时，酒店、网吧和公共浴室也要将加强对客人的核查。
警方在另一份通告中还要求，各部门寻找在爆炸中当场死亡的嫌疑人——色地尔丁•沙吾提的10名家庭成员。其中包括他的妻子、69岁的父亲、77岁的岳父以及兄弟等人。通知说，上述人员一旦找到，立即予以拘押。
有分析认为，当局的种种反常行为，说明警方并没有掌握爆炸嫌疑犯的具体行踪。 香港《苹果日报》也在5月3号的报导中指出，新疆警方被指为求立功，疑似未破案先捷报。而《法国国际广播电台》则报导，4.30爆炸案至少有两名疑犯在逃。
伍凡：“为什么要这么做，因为这个案子太大了，习近平前脚走，后面爆炸，这个新疆乌鲁木齐的警察局，太没有脸了，太丢脸了，习近平都发火了，那么这些人要想尽一切办法要弥补这个漏洞，就想出各种怪招来。”
另据一位网友向《新唐人》记者爆料，他在政府部门从事编稿工作的一个朋友，专业是民族研究。那位朋友告诉他，官方自去年所有的涉及新疆事件稿子，全部是出自他手。而目前，《环球时报》与《凤凰卫视》都在向他索要这次新疆爆炸案的新闻稿，但他实在不知道该如何编下去，因为之前所有的新闻都是按照当局的意愿编造出来的。
那位知情人士还透露，当局就是要把所有事件编造成有组织的，例如4.30火车站爆炸事件，官媒之所以宣传袭击者“先用刀砍人，后引爆炸弹”，就是为了让民众对昆明事件有个延续性。将这些袭击事件，统统归咎于民族问题或“恐怖份子”袭击。
随着民间陆续有知情人士以及目击者的消息流出，目前已经有越来越多的网民对近年来发生的一系列所谓“恐怖袭击”事件产生质疑，人们认为，这更有可能是被触动的利益集团，针对习李政府发出的警告和报复，而非“民族或宗教问题”。
采访编辑/张天宇 后制/萧宇
Wanted: Reward for Xinjiang Explosion Suspects Already Killed?
Xinjiang police claimed the Urumqi train station explosion,
a terrorist attack, has been solved, and that the attackers
were killed at the scene within 24 hours of the incident.
However, a 100,000 yuan reward was then offered
for clues regarding the attackers.
The notice was then quickly removed later.
This series of reactions by the authorities has been widely
called into question.
It is suspected that the police falsified the report
and the suspects are still at large.
On May 3, Urumqi police released a reward notice
on its official Sina Weibo which read: “Investigation
of the two suspects of the violent terror attack
at the Urumqi train station on April 30 continues.
Any information about the suspects’ vehicle, housing rental
or lodging should be reported to the police.
Contact officers Han, Zhang, and Wang.”
NTD reporter: “Is this police officer Han?"
Xinjiang police station at Shayibake branch: “Ah, this is."
Reporter: “I would like to know how many suspects
are involved in the reward notice on the Internet?"
Police officer Han: “Two. The notice has specified
that it is two."
The police also claimed to award 100,000 yuan for credible
clues, and those who conceal and do not report
will be held liable.
In addition, photos of suspects were attached with the notice.
Within 24 hours of the explosion, Xinjiang police
and Mainland media announced that the case had been solved
overnight, the explosion was a serious and violent terrorist
attack, the explosion killed three people including
the two suspects, two attackers were Uighurs
from Xinjiang, of which the identity of one was confirmed.
Netizens questioned why authorities have posted a reward
for suspects they claimed were dead.
Was the ‘solved’ case a fabrication?
Wu Fan, commentator: “To put it bluntly, it is full of deceit
and cheating.
No suspects have been caught, they have not even a slight
idea of who the suspects are.
The case has not been solved at all.
The name they released was false, unreal, and incomplete.
It is very likely that none of those killed were the suspects."
Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported on May 3
that Xinjiang police issued an internal order on May 1
demanding a thorough investigation with deployment
of secret service to the hotels, cafes and public baths.
Another internal police notice requested the search for
and detention of 10 family members of a killed suspect,
including his wife, his 69-year old father, 77-year old in-law,
and brothers.
The abnormal police behavior has led analysts to believe
the authorities have no specific information of the suspects.
Hong Kong’s Apple Daily also reported on May 3
that Xinjiang police were accused of seeking meritorious
service award with false report.
RFI reported that at least two suspects were at large.
Wu Fan: “Why did the police falsify the report?
This case is huge.
Immediately after Xi Jinping concluded his visit,
the explosion took place.
It is humiliating to the Xinjiang police.
It is also embarrassing to Xi, who was very angry.
These people tried to make up for the big flaw
with the falsified report."
A netizen told NTD that a friend of his who works
on drafting news reports for the government
is a professional ethnic researcher.
His friend revealed to him that all transcripts for media
about Xinjiang incidents, such as those from
the Global Times and Phoenix TV, came from his writings.
However, he was completely at a loss when editing news
about the Xinjiang explosion, because all the press releases
have all been fabricated according to authorities’ wishes.
This source disclosed the authorities’ inclination
to link all incidents to religious organizions,
including the Urumqi train station bombing.
It was reported as a ’stabbing followed by detonation
of bombs’ purposely to tie it to the Kunming incident.
All incidents will be attributed to ethnic issues
or terrorist attacks.
Information revealed by insiders as well as witnesses
have people questioning the so-called terrorist attack.
People actually suspect that instead of ethnic or religious
issues, the incidents are rather a warning and revenge against
Xi Jinping’s leadership by his political opponents
in the regime.
Interview & Edit/Zhangyianyu Post-Production/Xiaoyu
