【禁闻】曝光中宣部密令 记者遭报复解聘

【新唐人2014年05月27日讯】大陆网络作家,财经记者张贾龙日前被解聘,原因是张贾龙在此前与美国国务卿约翰•克里的会谈中,发表了“过激”言论,并且在网上“泄漏”了中宣部的指令。对此,张贾龙表示:“知道这一天早晚会到来”。

据大陆媒体人张贾龙在博客上发表的“被解聘情况说明”中说,5月23号,“腾讯公司”以“泄漏商业机密等保密敏感信息行为”为由,与他解除了劳动合同。张贾龙指出,当局试图封住他的嘴,让他不能再宣扬所谓“反党反社会主义言论”,这表明中共控制下的媒体对持异见的媒体人是绝不容忍的。

中国自由撰稿人刘逸明:“我觉得腾讯公司解雇他的这个理由是非常牵强的、非常讽刺的。这叫欲加之罪,何患无辞。就像高瑜被抓,说她是泄漏9号文件,实际上主要还是因为她撰写的文章,揭露了很多高层的黑幕,得罪很多高层权贵,这才是她遭到打击报复的原因所在。”

据了解,今年2月15号,张贾龙等四名大陆知名媒体人士,曾与美国国务卿克里就“中国互联网自由”等问题,进行了约40分钟的会谈。期间,张贾龙曾向克里提出,希望美国能够帮助渴望网络自由的大陆民众,一起推倒中国的网络防火长城。此外,张贾龙还谴责部分美国公司协助中国政府,阻止网民登陆“推特”、“脸书”等社交媒体,和封锁其它网站。

张贾龙透露,就在与克里会谈后的第二天,中宣部下发禁令,要求各网站查删这次会面的相关报导,《腾讯微博》甚至把“张贾龙”三个字列为敏感词。17号“腾讯”的领导告诉他,等公司和中宣部协调出处理结果之后,将对他的工作进行调整,不排除有离职的可能。

张贾龙对此表示:我知道这一天早晚会来,因为无产阶级专政没有例外,任何挑战它的个人都会被当成敌人。

刘逸明:“他跟之前李建军、陈永洲等很多有良心、有勇气的记者一样,就是因为他们的本质跟现在中国的新闻制度、政治体制格格不入,所以他们最终无法逃脱被挤出体制内的命运。”

张贾龙认为,公司2月没有立刻将他解聘,可能是考虑中美关系和国际舆论的影响。也有媒体人士认为,中宣部选择在这个时间点向“腾讯”施压解聘张贾龙,很可能与即将到来的“六四”25周年有关。

刘逸明:“前段时间没有动静,为什么现在这段时间反而要将这个事情提上议事日程呢?我觉得还是跟敏感日期将要到来有关系,因为再一些天就到了六四25周年,所以,它们希望能够在敏感时期到来之前,通过解雇张贾龙,来达到杀鸡儆猴的目地,警告其他的国内媒体人。”

张贾龙还指出,他在网络上公开了中宣部向“腾讯”下达的“密令”,让世人知道了中国的新闻审查和舆论控制是如何进行的,将宣传部门的铁幕撕开一条缝,令中宣部恼羞成怒。

据张贾龙透露,中国的宣传部门经常向媒体发布禁令,根据现实和宣传需要严格控制舆论。宣传部门的禁令也被当作所谓的“机密”予以保护。因此“腾讯”才会以“泄漏商业机密”作为解聘张贾龙的借口。

刘逸明:“要说他泄漏了秘密,那就是中宣部的这些指令,这些指令它属于政治秘密,也不算什么商业秘密了。拿这个来定张贾龙的罪,肯定是说不过去的。因为中宣部的这些指令,本身就违背宪法,言论自由、新闻自由的这些条款。”

张贾龙在博客上列举了一系列中宣部下达的“密令”,其中包括命令查删“雾霾引起的政治话题”、 “在越中资企业被越南人冲击”、“新疆乌鲁木齐爆炸案互动环节”、“声援浦志强的相关博文”、“李嘉诚内地撤资有隐情”等事件报导及相关言论、视频、图片等。

张贾龙指出,一个政权想长期给媒体罩上铁幕并以此与世界舆论隔绝,是难以持续的。因为所谓“真理部”的存在,侵犯自由、侵犯人权、侵犯国际法。

采访编辑/张天宇 后制/李勇

Journalist Is Dismissed Due to Leaking Confidential Orders
Issued by CCP’s Propaganda Department.

Mainland Internet writer and financial journalist Mr Zhang Jialong,
found himself recently dismissed from his job.

During his recent interview with US Secretary of State John Kerry,
he expressed radical words and also disclosed information,

concerning orders and instructions given by the Propaganda
Department of the Central Committee of the
Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

Regarding his dismissal, Mr Zhang Jialong says,
“I knew such a day would come sooner or later."

According to Zhang Jialong’s recent blog / article called,
“Explanations on my dismissal", on May 23,

Tencent Company used the excuse of “leaking commercial secrets
and other confidential and sensitive information",
to terminate his contract with them.

Mr Zhang commented that, local authorities tried
to make him silent, trying to block his “speeches of opposing the CCP and socialism".
This shows that the media under the CCP’s control,
absolutely does not accept journalists
who are dissidents as well.

Chinese freelance writer Liu Yiming: “I think the excuse
of Tencent firing him, is very far-fetched and ludicrous.
This is called, if you are out to condemn somebody,
they can always trump up a charge against you.
This is just like Ms Gao Yu who was charged
with the leaking of No. 9 Document.
The real fact is , because the articles written by her exposed many
dark goings on with high-rank officials,
it is highly likely it offended many of them.
This I feel is the real reason why she was attacked
and retaliated against."

It is understood that, on Feb. 15, four famous mainland
journalists were interviewed by US Secretary of State John Kerry.

The interview was based upon the topic “China’s Internet Freedom,"
the interview lasted for 40 minutes.

During the interview, Mr Zhang told Mr Kerry that he hopes
the US can help mainland people,who are eager for Internet freedom, to gather together to destroy China’s Internet Great Firewall.

In addition, Zhang Jialong also denounced some US companies
who assist CCP with blocking netizens,

who wish to freely visit social media web sites
such as Facebook and Twitter etc.

Zhang Jialong says, time had barely passed after his talk with
Kerry, that the Propaganda Department issued
a prohibition order,requiring all websites to delete the relevant reports
about there meeting.

Tencent Weibo even put “Zhang Jialong"
as, ‘sensitive characters’.

On May 17, his Tencent boss mentioned to him, that
its possible he will lose his job after discussions
were had between Tencent and Propaganda Team.

Zhang Jialong says: I knew such a day would come eventually,
simply because the proletariat dictatorship has no exception
to their rules,and anyone who challenges it, is usually seen as its enemy.

Liu Yiming: “Like the prior conscientious and brave journalists
such as Li Jianjun and Chen Yongzhou,
they are fundamentally incompatible with the current Chinese
news censorship and political system.
So eventually it became impossible to escape
from the fate of being squeezed away
from the official media system."

Zhang Jialong says, the reason that he was not immediately
fired in February,is that they (CCP) had considered the impact upon
Sino-American relationships and the international opinion.
Some media staff think, the reason that the Propaganda
Department chose such a time to push Tencent
to fire Zhang Jialong,might be relevant to the looming 25th Anniversary of the 64 Event.

Liu Yiming: “Why did he not receive the dismissal notice
earlier but does receive it now?
I think this might be pertinent to the incoming sensitive date.
Because a few days later, it will be 25th anniversary of 64 Event.
So the Authorities are using this tactic to scare other
journalists by dismissing Zhang Jialong
prior to the sensitive date."

Zhang Jialong also added, he managed to make public
“the secret order" of Propaganda Department
issued to Tencent,

letting the world know how China’s news censorship and public
voice control is carried out.

This tears up a gap amidst the iron curtain
of the propaganda institutions,
leaving them shamed and angry.

According to Mr Zhang Jialong, the CCP’s propaganda
departments often issue prohibition orders to the media,
strictly controlling the public voice
according to the reality and propaganda needs.
The prohibition orders are also regarded as
so called “confidential “and to be protected.
Hence, Tencent use “leaking commercial secrets"
as the excuse for dismissing Zhang Jialong.

Liu Yiming: “If they say to him leak the secrets,
then what he leaked is their orders,
and they belong to political secrets
rather than commercial secrets.
They use this as the mistake of Zhang Jialong
and this does not make sense.
Because these orders issued by Propaganda Department
of the CCP violates the constitution,
freedom of speech and freedom of press."

Zhang Jialong also lists a series of secret orders issued
by the Propaganda Department of the CCP.

These include: deleting the reports, relevant speech,
videos and pictures of “political topics raised by the haze,"

“Chinese enterprises in Vietnam are attacked by Vietnamese,"

“Interactive steps of Urumqi explosion case of Xinjiang",

“relevant blog articles of supporting Mr Pu Zhiqiang,"

“there are hidden facts about Li Ka-shing withdrawing
investment in Mainland."

Zhang Jialong points out, a regime who tries to cover
up the media with an iron curtain and to sever China
from the worlds voices, is hard to maintain.

Because the existence of the so-called “Truth Department"
violates freedom, human rights and international laws.

Interview & Edit/Zhang Tianyu Post-Production/LiYong

相关文章
评论