【禁闻】港生不受控 党媒猛批被指空口无凭

FacebookPrintFont Size繁体

【新唐人2014年10月16日讯】占中行动已经持续近三周,作为占中主体的香港学生也成为了世界关注的焦点。但与全球多数媒体正面报导不同的是,中共的喉舌媒体对香港学生展开了极为猛烈的舆论讨伐。尽管多数港人没有受到舆论宣传的影响,但有民众担心,一旦当局发现舆论攻击无效,恐怕会采取暴力镇压。

自香港的真普选在中共人大的决议下变得无望之后,愤怒而失望的香港学生率先站出抗议,发起罢课行动,随即抗议队伍迅速扩大,越来越多的香港市民加入。如果说在初期,中共当局还没有将香港学生的“小打小闹”放在眼里,那么后来,形势可以说完全脱离了当局的掌控——香港学生成了占中的主体,受到世界媒体关注。

于是,中共媒体又一次显现出了它的“步调一致,口径一致,语调一致”的特点,中共央视、党媒《人民日报》、《环球时报》,以及亲共港媒《大公报》、《文汇报》开足了马力,对学生持续猛烈攻击,各大门户网站紧跟其后,内容五花八门。

先是《人民日报》海外版,在9月5号以《青春懵懂有热血 被当枪使不自知 被街头政治裹挟的香港学生》为题,指责香港学生“连政改是怎么回事都没搞清”,“糊里糊涂被当枪使”。

香港城市大学政治学讲座教授郑宇硕:“大家自身是香港人,大家的眼睛也是雪亮的,看得很清楚,就是你中共不给我们真正的政治的权利,想把香港变成中国大陆里头一个普普通通的大城市。大家不愿意当顺民,大家出来发声音。因为大家知道今天不出来发声,以后不知道还有没有机会,大家要跑出来保卫自己的核心价值,自己的生活方式,自己的尊严。都是年轻人自发的参加。”

此外,喉舌媒体们对于香港学生的组织者也格外的“情有独钟”,不但指称香港专上学生联会和学民思潮“有钱、有后台”,学联反对派有“黑幕”,而且还抹黑学联领袖周永康是“台独”、“港独”,学运领袖黄之峰是“美国特务”等。就连中共一贯采用的“西方颠覆论”、“境外阴谋论”也再次被抛出。

对此,持中立立场的大陆法律界人士表示,先不论中共媒体宣传的内容真与假,单就当局针对学生组织者的一系列指控,就有涉嫌“媒体煽动”的味道,不但逻辑混乱,而且空口无凭。

中国律师观察网总编赵国君:“我认为《文汇报》也好,还有《人民日报》海外版也好都太武断了,不负责任。如果说指控别人受外国指使,这是一种文学化描述的语言。如果按照法律证据来说,你得指出证据——他是否犯有间谍罪?是否有投敌行为?这都是法律上应该有严格定义的。但是如果说真的有这样的指控,该有严格的证据,不能妄断。所以我觉得官方指控涉嫌轻率,有点媒体化煽动的味道。”

而对于大多数港民来说,党媒针对“学联”、“学运”领袖的指控,就像“骂街小报”的气势。

郑宇硕:“这当然是中共一贯的手法。不过,目前这一类的抹黑行动就大量的升级。大家当然也不相信,大家看得很清楚,这个占中行动的参与者都是自发的,他们事实上也不接受任何组织的领导等。你怎么抹黑一两个年轻的学生、学运领袖,是没有用的。”

对于香港民众的“不买账”,中共当局对于香港大学生舆论攻击的势头已经有所减弱,但经历过历次运动的民众担心,这有可能是风暴前的“平静”。中共一向的做法是:当谎言不足以“维稳”时,暴力和恐怖就将登场。

采访/秦雪 编辑/张天宇 后制/葛雷

Vindictive CCP Trash Media Defaming HK Student Leaders

Three weeks have passed since the Occupy Central
movement began.
At the leading edge of the movement, Hong Kong students
have drawn attention from global media.
In sharp contrast to most international media, the Chinese
Communist Party (CCP) mouthpieces keep striking at student
protesters in an extreme vicious manner.

However most Hong Kong people are not moved by such
propaganda trash.
However, some worry that the CCP may use violence to
suppress the students once they find that the media assaults
do not work.

After the CCP’s NPC issued a statement that refuses universal
suffrage in Hong Kong, HK students were amongst the first
ones to protested against the decision.

They started the strike, which was then joined by an ever
increasing number of HK civilians.
Initially, the CCP might not have taken the HK students strike
very seriously.
However, they quickly lost control of the situation.
As the leading group of the Occupy Central movement,
HK students became the focus of global media.

In such a situation, CCP mouthpieces again showed the world
how they “act, speak and conspire" in concert with the party.
CCTV, People’s Daily, Global times and pro-CCP HK media
such as Ta Kung Pao and Wen Wei Po have spared no efforts
in attacking student protesters.

Major portal websites in mainland China have also followed
closely, by releasing all kinds of scandalous articles to defame HK
students.

On Sept. 5, People’s Daily started the shameful attacks with an
article titled:
“Too Young and Warm-Blood, HK Students Don’t Know
They Are Being Used and Coerced by Street Politics."
The article sneered that HK students “don’t even know
what a political reform is like" and “are being used
as a political weapon".

Yu-shek Cheng, professor of political science at City
University of Hong Kong:
“We live in Hong Kong and we know clearly that the CCP
does not give us real political rights.
They attempt to turn Hong Kong into a place
similar to all other big cities in mainland China.
We don’t want to accept that and therefore stand out
to let our voices be heard.
We know that if we don’t speak out today, maybe we won’t
have a second chance to do that.
We go to streets to protect our core values and life style,
as well as our dignity. Those young people mostly
joined the movement voluntarily."

Furthermore, CCP mouthpieces have shown
“special interest" in the organization of HK student groups.
They claimed that the HK Federation of Students (HKFS)
and Scholarism are “financially and political" supported
and there are “inside storie" behind the scenes.

They also defamed HKFS secretary-general Chow Yong-kang
as a “supporter of Taiwan and HK independence".
Another student leader Joshua Wong was also reported
as a “U.S. spy".
As usual, the CCP again attributed the movement to so-called
“foreign forces" that attempt to overturn the CCP.

Being neutral on what occurred in Hong Kong, a Chinese
legal professional said that:
regardless of whether what the CCP mouthpieces said is true
or false, its attacks against the HK student leader sounds like
media incitement.

Those reports are badly organized and illogical, and lack
evidences to support what they said.

Zhao Guojun, chief-editor of Chinese Lawyer Watcher
(ccwlawyer.com):
“I think Wen Wei Po or People’s Daily are too assertive in
making conclusions and those are irresponsible remarks.
Saying someone is incited by foreign forces to do something
is descriptive language used in literatures.
Legally, you need to present evidences to prove
he committed the crime of espionage or surrendered
to the enemy.

There are strict legal definitions of those acts.
So evidences needs to be presented in order to
make serious charges like that.

For this reason, I think those official reports are too hasty,
making them sound like media incitement."

For most HKers, what CCP mouthpieces said against the student
leaders sound like tabloid trash.

Yu-shek Cheng:"Of course the CCP has always been
playing tricks like that.
Currently they are just trying harder than usual
to throw mud at others.
We don’t believe what they say as we clearly see that
people joined Occupy Central movement of their own will.
They are not led by any group. So it is useless discrediting
one or two student leaders, no matter how hard they try."

The CCP’s media attacks have abated as they have little
effect on Hong Kong residents.
On the other hand, those experiencing CCP’s political
movements begin to worry that this may only be
the peace ahead of a storm.

In the past, the CCP would use violence and terror
when lies were not enough to “maintain stability"
of its regime.

Interview/QinXue edit/Zhang Tianyu post-production/GeLei

相关文章
评论