【禁闻】新古田会议后 中共猛批军队国家化

FacebookPrintFont Size繁体

【新唐人2014年11月06日讯】在1929年的“古田会议”上,中共确立了“党指挥枪”的原则。然而85年过去了,在今年10月30号到11月2号的中共全军“新古田会议”上,中共军委主席习近平再次强调了“军队坚持党的领导”。此后,中共官方各大媒体对此纷纷表态,强调党指挥枪的重要性。很多媒体还批判了“军队国家化”的论调。

《解放军报》、《新华网》等中共媒体,近来连续发表评论员文章纪念古田会议,并进一步强化党指挥枪的理念,清除军队国家化的杂音。

《环球时报》评论说,“散布‘军队国家化’的可谓是一批‘心很黑’的力量,在这一核心问题上跟着摇旗呐喊的,大概是中国最糊涂的一批人。”

红二代少将罗援则宣称,中共“军队国家化亡党亡国。”

美国中文杂志《中国事务》总编辑伍凡:“现在习近平上台之后,他更要拉的军队紧紧的,不把军队拉住,共产党就完蛋了,所以为什么罗援写的文章说,军队国家化就亡党亡国。是的,共产党要亡。我们问一句,共产党为什么不可以亡呢?”

美国中文杂志《中国事务》总编辑伍凡表示,军队是老百姓纳税养的,为什么归于一个党、听一个党指挥呢?

大陆知名学者曹思源最近在网上撰文表示,研究完世界上110个国家的宪法,他发现84个国家规定军队归属政府。即使没有在宪法中作出规定的国家,军队实际上也是归属政府。他认为,世界各国军队国家化是大势所趋。

曹思源教授还揭示,从《毛泽东选集》中看出,毛在1945年曾明确地说:“军队是国家的”。

前中共总理周恩来还在1946年1月16号,曾代表中共公布了军队国家化的具体标准:军队不属于个人;军队不属于派系﹔军队不属于地方;军队不属于政党﹔军队属于国家。

维权律师李方平也在社交媒体上发了一张标为1944年《新华日报》的图片。图片上写道:“军队国家化是新中国的基本国策,党卫军是法西斯和蒋介石才干的事情,是欺骗人民的卑鄙手段”。

伍凡:“共产党说话不算话。在70年前,共产党反对国民党蒋介石的时候,它要求军队国家化,它要把军队从国民党的党军变成国家军队。

伍凡表示,中共自己建政后完全变了,死死把军队控制在它的手下,是名副其实的党卫军,但现在台湾的军队已经国家化了。

其实,近年来,针对中共军队是否应该国家化的讨论声音不断增加。据说,18大前,中共总参谋部副总参谋长章沁生,就因公开主张军队国家化被军委停了职。

近来,随着徐才厚落马引发的军队异动,中共也升高了批判“军队国家化”的调门。

中共军委第一副主席许其亮撰文称,要“善于从法理高度旗帜鲜明批驳‘军队非党化、非政治化’和‘军队国家化’。”国防大学教授公方彬也回应说,“军队国家化”没有法理基础。

“中国社会民主党”中央委员会主持人刘因全指出,大陆的宪法是中共起草,并让“人大”这个橡皮图章强行通过的。这个宪法不是人民表决产生的,产生的本身就不合法。

刘因全认为,军队成为党卫军,就是当年希特勒纳粹给世界造成灾难的根本原因。现在全世界都走向“军队国家化”,但中共以中国特殊为由而反对,就是想维持对中国人的奴役。

“中国社会民主党”中央委员会主持人刘因全:“他们制造的这种中国特殊论,这是为了维持一党专制编造的谬论。说什么别的国家可以实行军队国家化,中国不行。为什么中国不行?没有道理嘛!”

刘因全指出,中共制造了多种“中国特色”谎言,像中国人素质低不能搞民主、不能有人权,目的是维护它们在中国为所欲为的专制统治。

采访/易如 编辑/宋风

Communist Propaganda Attack of Nationalized Army

In 1929, at a military political work conference in Gutian,
the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) established
the principle of “the Party commands the gun."

The CCP Military Commission Chairman Xi Jinping
reiterated the absolute leadership of the Party
over the military 85 years later during
the new Gutian Conference on Oct. 30.

Subsequently, Chinese media showed their support
by stressing the importance of Party control over the army.

Many Communist media also criticized
civilian control of the military.

Communist media such as People’s Liberation Army Daily
and Xinhua have issued commentaries commemorating
the Gutian Conference to strengthen the principle
of Party control of the army, and to eradicate the noise,
i.e., the one supports the civilian control of the military.

The CCP mouthpiece Global Times commented that,
‘those who advocate nationalization of the military
are dark forces; those who cheer on the issue
are most likely the losers.’

Major General Luo Yuan claimed, “nationalization of the
military will surely demise the Party and ruin the nation."

China Affairs magazine editor-in-chief, Chris Wu:
“For Xi Jinping, he has to hold the army tightly.

Without the army, the CCP is gone.

That’s why Luo Yuan stated that the nationalization
of the army will ruin the Party and the state.

Yes, the CCP should perish.
But, we ask, why can’t the Party perish?"

Chris Wu indicates that the army relies on taxes.
Why should the army take commands from a Party?

Renowned Chinese scholar Cao Siyuan argued in an online
article that of 110 constitutions in the world, 84 defined
the army under the control of the government.

The ones without specific ruling also put
the army under the control of government.

He believes nationalization of the army is the trend.

Professor Cao Siyuan also revealed that in the “Selected
Works of Mao Zedong", Mao clearly stated in 1945 that,
“The army belongs to the country."

In fact, no army in the world does not belong to the state.

Former Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai also announced
the army nationalization standard on Jan. 16, 1946:

“The army does not belong to the individual;
the army does not belong to factions;
the army does not belong to the place;
the army does not belong to political parties;
the army belongs to the state."

Human rights lawyer Li Fangping publicized a 1944
Xinhua Daily report online:

“Nationalization of the military is the new China’s basic
national policy.

Party military is a dirty trick to deceive the people
by the like of fascist and Chiang Kai-shek."

Chris Wu: “The CCP says one thing and does another.

To oppose Chiang Kai-shek and his Kuomintang
70 years ago, the CCP demanded nationalization
of the army so that the Kuomintang army would become
a national army."

Chris Wu indicates that after the regime was established,
the CCP tightly controled the army and the PLA
is the CCP army, while the army in Taiwan has transitioned
into a state army.

In fact, in recent years, voices in support of nationalization
of the PLA have been heard.

It was said that prior to the 18th National Congress,
Deputy Chief of the General Staff Zhang Qinsheng
was dismissed for his public advocate
of army nationalization.

Following the downfall of Xu Caihou, the criticism
of army nationalization has been increased.

First Deputy Chairman of the Central Military Commission
Xu Qiliang wrote, “Must clearly refute the ‘non-Party’,
‘non-political’ and ‘nationalized’ army."

“National Defense University professor Gong Fangbin also
responded, “Nationalization of the military has no legal basis."

China Social Democratic Party Central Committee moderator
Liu Yinquan points out that CCP drafted the constitution
and forced the People’s Congress to pass the law.

The constitution was illegal because
it was not voted on by the people.

Liu Yinquan believes that the Party army is the underlying
cause of the world disaster caused by the Nazi Hitler.

While the worlds armies are nationalized, the CCP fights
against it with the excuse of China being special
just for the purpose of slavering the Chinese.

Liu Yinquan: “The so-called ‘China being special’ is to
maintain the concocted fallacy of one-party dictatorship.

Why can’t China’s army be nationalized but others can?

It does not make sense!"

Liu Yinquan points out that the lies about China’s
Characteristics such as the low quality of Chinese does not
suit for democracy or deserve human rights are created
by the CCP to preserve its authoritarian rule in China.eng

Interview/YiRu Edit/ShongFeng

相关文章
评论